Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 1_corinthians_14 [2024/07/22 04:46] – created pastordaniel
+++ 1_corinthians_14 [2024/07/23 00:50] (current) – pastordaniel
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 There is a scholarly perspective suggesting that Paul might be quoting a cultural or traditional view in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 and then refuting it in verse 36. This interpretation hinges on the idea that Paul is addressing a specific issue within the Corinthian church, possibly influenced by Greco-Roman cultural norms regarding women's roles.
-. **Quotation-Refutation Device**: Some scholars propose that Paul uses a quotation-refutation device in this passage. This means he quotes a prevailing view or statement (verses 34-35) and then refutes it (verse 36). This interpretation is supported by the structure and rhetorical style of Paul's letters³.
+. **Quotation-Refutation Device**: Some scholars propose that Paul uses a quotation-refutation device in this passage. This means he quotes a prevailing view or statement (verses 34-35) and then refutes it (verse 36). This interpretation is supported by the structure and rhetorical style of Paul's letters.
 . **Cultural Context**: The instructions in verses 34-35 align with Greco-Roman cultural norms, where women were expected to be silent and submissive in public gatherings. However, Paul's broader teachings often challenge cultural norms, suggesting a more egalitarian view of women in the church⁵.
-. **Manuscript Evidence**: Some ancient manuscripts, such as Codex Vaticanus and Codex Fuldensis, show variations in the placement and wording of verses 34-35, indicating that these verses might have been a later addition or marginal comment⁴.
-. **Scholarly Articles**: Articles like "1 Corinthians 14:33b-38 as a Pauline Quotation-Refutation Device" discuss this interpretation in detail, providing evidence from textual analysis and historical context³.
+**Scholarly Articles**
-These perspectives suggest that Paul might be quoting a restrictive view on women's roles in verses 34-35 and then refuting it in verse 36 by emphasizing that the word of God did not originate from the Corinthians alone and is not limited to them.
-Would you like to explore more about this topic or any other biblical passages?
+  * [[https://www.cbeinternational.org/resource/1-corinthians-1433b-38-pauline-quotation-refutation-device/|1 Corinthians 14:33b-38 as a Pauline Quotation-Refutation Device (CBE International)]]
+  * [[https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol52/iss2/3/|The Trajectory of an Egalitarian Ethic in the Letters of Paul: The Case for Women's Ordination (Leo S. Ranzolin Jr., Pacific Union College)]]
-Source: Conversation with Copilot, 7/21/2024
+//NOTE: Part of this entry was generated by AI//
-(1) 1 Corinthians 14:33b-38 as a Pauline Quotation-Refutation Device. https://www.cbeinternational.org/resource/1-corinthians-1433b-38-pauline-quotation-refutation-device/.
-(2) 1 Corinthians 14 | Bible.org. https://bible.org/seriespage/1-corinthians-14.
-(3) Is 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 a Marginal Comment or a Quotation?. https://www.pbpayne.com/phils-new-article-on-1-corinthians-1434-35/.
-(4) Which law was Paul referring to in 1 Corinthians 14:34?. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/41432/which-law-was-paul-referring-to-in-1-corinthians-1434.
-(5) 1 Corinthians 14:34 | Bible Exposition Commentary. https://versebyversecommentary.com/2003/01/22/1-corinthians-1434-35/.
-(6) undefined. https://biblehub.com/greek/1135.htm.
-(7) undefined. https://biblehub.com/greek/4601.htm.